While offering the RNC chief, Michael Steele, some “friendly advice” (nothing condescending there, right?), Malkin writes:

There's nothing wrong with criticizing Rush Limbaugh. But if you are going to go on Obamedia outlets like CNN and throw around words like “incendiary” and “ugly,” you better back them up.

Malkin seems to suggest that if he had to, Steele could not back up those adjectives, so it was a mistake for him to use them. We chuckled. Did Malkin really want Steele to add meat to the Limbaugh's “ugly” and “incendiary” bones on live, national TV? Malkin would have preferred it if Steele had detailed Limbaugh's brand of loony hate?

If anyone's curious about what Steele was referring to in terms of the “ugly” and “incendiary” nature of Limbaugh's show, they can start by clicking here.