JOE CONCHA: What worries me, Sean, to be honest with you -- 2018 and 2020, if somebody wants to take a political opponent out, and somebody in some back room, a guy behind the guy in some strategy war room, decides to put together an elaborate scheme to have somebody accused of sexual harassment, it seems now that you're guilty until proven innocent in the media, because so many people are actually guilty, that everybody is going to be painted with this broad brush.
And it's going to be used as a political weapon to take out opponents, and that's my fear right now, that we're going down a very slippery slope, where we're jumping to conclusions immediately.
SEAN HANNITY (HOST): In other words, you are afraid, because of what the atmosphere is -- but there are two different responses every time. One is “I didn't do it,” and people fight back, and there -- by the way, that would be the case of John Conyers or Roy Moore. And I have been steadfast in my belief that there should be a presumption of innocence.
Like, for example, in the case of Roy Moore, I don't understand -- we have in one case, he says he didn't know a woman. The woman claims, “Well, look at my yearbook.” I had a 42-year professional handwriting expert on this show that says they could absolutely -- if they can get his handwriting from the time, with 100 percent accuracy, they will be able to determine if he wrote that on the yearbook. And they would be able to determine forensically if the ink exists. Why isn't that moving forward?
