Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, has written a column on The Huffington Post about Glenn Beck's violent rhetoric, specifically its role in an aborted attack against frequent Beck target the Tides Foundation:
Williams pulled the trigger on those two officers, but Beck's harsh rhetoric against Tides and other leaders of progressive groups, whom he identifies as "enemies," have helped stoke the fires of outrage in a sector of the American public that is armed and eager to do battle with foes that they believe -- or have been led to believe - are in some way destroying our country.
Beck acknowledges that he has viewers who are capable of responding violently to his hyperbolic accusations. He has warned, "it is only a matter of time before an actual crazy person really does something stupid."
Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.) recently lost a primary for the seat he's held from 1993-1999 and since 2005 to a conservative challenger. In an interview with Mother Jones' David Corn, he discusses the spread of misinformation from the conservative media and how he feels it has affected the Republican party. Discussing a meeting Inglis held with conservative donors:
"They were upset with me," Inglis recalls. "They are all Glenn Beck watchers." About 90 minutes into the meeting, as he remembers it, "They say, 'Bob, what don't you get? Barack Obama is a socialist, communist Marxist who wants to destroy the American economy so he can take over as dictator. Health care is part of that. And he wants to open up the Mexican border and turn [the US] into a Muslim nation.'" Inglis didn't know how to respond.
Fox & Friends baselessly suggested that Rep. Alan Grayson's (D-FL) mailing of a DVD to his constituents constituted an "ethics violation." In fact, a spokesman for the committee that oversees the approval of such mailings told Media Matters that Grayson's DVD had been vetted and that the mailing was "not a violation" of House ethics rules.
The business blog The Big Picture has created a fascinating info-graphic explaining the details of how Glenn Beck and Goldline operate to bilk investors of their money.
Goldline, one of the major sponsors of Beck's radio and TV shows, has been accused of pushing overpriced gold coins on customers. The company has been promoted by Beck as some sort of safeguard against the policies of the Obama administration. Currently, Goldline is under investigation by the Santa Monica City Attorney's office and the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office.
At the same time Rep. Anthony Weiner has been investigating Goldline's business practices, and demanding explanations from the company.
The Big Picture's graphic is below the fold.
Even after Andrew Breitbart's video of Shirley Sherrod's NAACP speech was uncovered as a deceptively edited excerpt that distorted her comments, conservatives have continued to attack Sherrod with a barrage of false or ludicrous smears.
To listen to the conservative media, the Daily Caller has exposed the discussion listserv Journolist as some sort of hotbed of liberal message coordination. Ann Althouse said it "was designed -- apparently -- to figure out how to structure the various news stories to serve the interests of their party," Limbaugh said the emails showed "mainstream coordination with the left," and Beck saw a plot "to help Barack Obama."
This theory of secret list coordinating all manner of nefarious activities gets debunked, however, by the latest Journolist story from the Daily Caller:
Ezra Klein of the Washington Post, the founder of Journolist, quickly jumped in: "Nope, no message coordination. I'm not even sure that would be legal. This is a discussion list, though, and I want it to retain that character," he wrote.
So, here is list founder Ezra Klein, in about as explicit terms as you can get, telling the participants on the list not to coordinate any messages. He doesn't hint at it or speak about it in a confusing manner, he says "no message coordination." It couldn't be any clearer. The conservative conspiracy about Journolist goes up in smoke, as expected.
In his Washington Times op-ed today former congressman Tom Tancredo claimed (despite the evidence to the contrary) that President Obama had betrayed the Constitution with a statement to Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ) that "the administration will not enforce security on our southern border because that would remove Republicans' desire to negotiate a 'comprehensive' immigration bill." Tancredo decided that this false allegation was grounds for impeachment.
Appearing on Fox's America Live, Tom Tancredo conceded to Megyn Kelly that the story at the heart of his column was false, after Kelly explained to him that she had personally seen Kyl reverse his accusation against the President during a Fox News interview.
The Washington Times printed an editorial from Tancredo whose central premise was false before they even went to press, and now even Tancredo has conceded that it was false. So will the Washington Times issue a correction?
Oh, Politico, why do you do this? We've noted time and again Politico's tireless devotion to the elevation of absolute nonsense into the national discourse, but even they aren't usually as blatant with their cluelessness. Politico has a list of what they term "50 Politicos To Watch," and among this crowd is - seriously - Andrew Breitbart.
No, this isn't an unfortunate coincidence where some poor congressional aide or K Street lawyer shares a name with serial fabricator and smear artist Andrew Breitbart. This is the Andrew Breitbart, in the same week where his dishonesty was exposed (yet again) in the attack on Shirley Sherrod. This is who Politico holds up as someone with "a certain mystique." That's not mystique, Politico, those are pants on fire.
Even worse, Greg Sargent of the Washington Post asked Politico editor John Harris why would they write a glossy ode to a charlatan like Breitbart? His answer: "The Breitbart piece for the 50 Politicos feature was assigned and reported weeks ago." But we've known for months now that Breitbart's stock in trade is blatant dishonesty. The episode with Sherrod is just the latest fabrication to come from Team Breitbart, but most notable was the undercover ACORN videos the California Attorney General described as "severely" edited. This information about Breitbart was well known and yet Politico still assigned a writer to tell us about Breitbart's "mystique."
What Politico is telling us with this selection of Breitbart is that what they choose to elevate and celebrate in Washington is a figure consistently associated with dishonesty and farce. So be it.
Fox News misreporting on health care reform? You could be excused if you saw the following exchange on America Live with Megyn Kelly and assumed it was a rerun from earlier this year or last summer, because the same old tired and incorrect assertions about the public option turned up again.
The video of now-former USDA official Shirley Sherrod released by Andrew Breitbart's Big Government discussing work she did with the Federation of Southern Cooperative/Land Assistance Fund was an excerpt from a longer speech. According to Sherrod, the video doesn't show the full context of her remarks and leaves a false impression.
But Tuesday morning, Sherrod said what online viewers weren't told in reports posted throughout the day Monday was that the tale she told at the banquet happened 24 years ago -- before she got the USDA job -- when she worked with the Georgia field office for the Federation of Southern Cooperative/Land Assistance Fund.
Sherrod said the short video clip excluded the breadth of the story about how she eventually worked with the man over a two-year period to help ward off foreclosure of his farm, and how she eventually became friends with him and his wife.
"And I went on to work with many more white farmers," she said. "The story helped me realize that race is not the issue, it's about the people who have and the people who don't. When I speak to groups, I try to speak about getting beyond the issue of race."
Conservative bloggers have raised questions about the abrupt end of Breitbart's tape, and wondered what the rest of the tape shows. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution's Jay Bookman also raises questions about the full tape:
So let's see the rest of the tape, Big Government. Was Sherrod giggling among black folk about the time she put it to the white man, as the leaked excerpt suggests, or was the tape a deceptively edited excerpt of a longer story about getting beyond the issue of race, as she claims?
Let's see the tape. The evidence apparently exists to settle the question. Cough it up.
We've seen this before. When the Attorney General of California finally got ahold of the unedited version of the Breitbart-promoted Giles/O'Keefe videos attacking ACORN, he called them a "highly selective editing of reality."
Based on Breitbart's terrible track record with the truth, until he releases the full, unedited video, the version of the story that he's promoting lacks credibility.