Fox's Katie Pavlich Baselessly Speculates That Napolitano Lied Under Oath About Operation Fast And Furious
Written by Timothy Johnson
Published
Fox News contributor and Townhall news editor Katie Pavlich made the unfounded claim that Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano lied about her knowledge of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms' Operation Fast and Furious, a failed gun trafficking sting. This accusation is a serious one, as Napolitano has testified under oath before Congress that she was unaware of the ATF program while it was ongoing.
Pavlich's claim, which centers around the fact that Napolitano has a relationship with the former U.S. attorney involved in Fast and Furious, is entirely speculative and is unsupported by a recent independent investigation by the DHS Office of the Inspector General. The report concluded, “The DHS Secretary did not learn about Operation Fast and Furious, its flawed methodology, or that [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] had assigned an [Homeland Security Investigations] special agent to the task force until mid-March 2011” when the existence of the operation was public knowledge.
But according to Pavlich it is “implausible” that Napolitano didn't know about Fast and Furious while the operation was ongoing because of her “personal and professional relationship” with former U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke, who was involved in Fast and Furious. From the March 25 edition of Fox & Friends:
GRETCHEN CARLSON, HOST: So you do not believe that it's feasible that Janet Napolitano did not know about this before she said she did?
PAVLICH: It really is implausible that Janet Napolitano is getting off scot-free with this report. Let me tell you why. Former U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke, who was in charge of the Department of Justice side of Operation Fast and Furious in Arizona, has a longstanding personal and professional relationship with Janet Napolitano. He served as her staffer when Janet Napolitano was the attorney general in Arizona, as her chief of staff when she was governor of Arizona, followed her into Washington D.C. as her advisor for Homeland Security for a year before being appointed back to U.S. Attorney by President Obama. At the same time he was in Arizona he was serving on Attorney General Eric Holder's advisory board and he was with Janet Napolitano two days after the murder of [U.S. Border Patrol agent] Brian Terry in Arizona and yet this report claims they never talked about this case. But it seems as if Janet Napolitano would ask about it at least.
Pavlich's claim that Napolitano is lying about her knowledge of Fast and Furious is entirely premised on an assumption about the relationship between Napolitano and Burke and is plainly contradicted by the DHS OIG report which found no evidence that Napolitano had any knowledge of the operation prior to what she indicated in testimony before Congress.
Pavlich wrote an error-riddled book about Operation Fast and Furious, a failed attempt by ATF to stop the diversion of firearms into Mexico, where she made a similar baseless claim against Attorney General Eric Holder about the date from which he had knowledge of Fast and Furious. This claim, and her conspiracy theory that Fast and Furious was designed as an Obama plot to increase public support for gun restrictions, was completely debunked by the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General report on Fast and Furious.
Despite claims from Pavlich and other conservative media figures that Holder was covering up his alleged involvement in Fast and Furious, the DOJ Office of the Inspector General “found no evidence that Attorney General Holder was informed about Operation Fast and Furious, or learned about the tactics employed by ATF in the investigation, prior to January 31, 2011,” a time period consistent with Holder's previous testimony on the matter. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), who led a congressional investigation into Fast and Furious agreed, noting during a September 20, 2012 hearing that it was an “important point” to acknowledge that Holder “was not found to know [about the operation's failed tactics].”
The DOJ OIG report also discounted Fast and Furious conspiracy theories, concluding that, “we found no evidence that the agents responsible for the cases had improper motives or were trying to accomplish anything other than dismantling a dangerous firearms trafficking organization”:
ATF's Phoenix Field Division, together with the U.S. Attorney's Office, bore primary responsibility for the conduct of Operations Wide Receiver and Fast and Furious. While we found no evidence that the agents responsible for the cases had improper motives or were trying to accomplish anything other than dismantling a dangerous firearms trafficking organization, we concluded that the conduct and supervision of the investigations was significantly flawed.