Devine’s appearance followed her column in the New York Post, in which she made the same repugnant claims.
There is zero evidence that “climate activists” are celebrating the awful impacts of coronavirus; on the contrary, there is also recognition that the reduction in carbon emissions during the pandemic is only temporary and will shoot back up again. Nonetheless, Devine will continue to lodge ridiculous attacks on climate activists, as she has a history of doing.
5. Candace Owens: “Climate doom predictions have always been about scaring citizens into more taxation and regulation.”
On May 11, conservative author Candace Owens tweeted: “Climate doom predictions have always been about scaring citizens into more taxation and regulation. … It is an ever-moving target and the costliest lie of every generation.”
Climate predictions have actually been remarkably consistent; one recent study found that “even 50-year-old climate models correctly predicted global warming.”
Owens is remarkably uninformed on the climate change issue; she was once shut down for her denial during an appearance, of all places, on The Joe Rogan Experience.
6. Wall Street Journal’s Holman Jenkins falsely states: “The extent of warming caused by rising CO2 is highly uncertain.”
In a June 5 column, longtime Wall Street Journal columnist and editorial board member Holman Jenkins reviewed Michael Moore’s controversial environmental documentary Planet of the Humans stating that Moore “finds green energy a capitalist scam but learns nothing about climate science.” He further stated, “The extent of warming caused by rising CO2 is highly uncertain. This is what the science actually tells us. It’s a more-or-less problem, not an end-of-the-world problem."
Climate scientists are very certain about how much CO2 affects global warming -- in fact, 100% of global warming right now is due to human activity. By stating it’s a “more-or-less problem,” Jenkins is peddling the newest and perhaps most dangerous form of climate denial -- that climate change is happening, but it’s not really that bad.
Again, the Earth is on pace for about 3 degrees Celsius of warming, which is catastrophic for the planet. But Jenkins has always been obtuse in his writing about climate change -- he has little understanding of the issue, similar to the Wall Street Journal editorial board in general, which itself has a long history of climate denial.
7. Frequent right-wing media contributor Jason Issac co-authors an op-ed claiming that “‘climate justice’ spending” is “counterproductive” and actually harms communities of color
According to members of the Koch-backed, fossil-fuel promoting Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF), plans to address climate change hurt minority communities. Jason Isaac and Richard Johnson of the Texas Public Policy Foundation made this case in a June 25 op-ed in the Washington Examiner, writing, “If black lives really matter, activists should focus their efforts on mitigating economic disparities and providing the opportunity for all people to prosper, not on counterproductive ‘climate justice’ spending.” The op-ed trashed the Green New Deal, and hand-waves pollution in major cities by stating that “overall, the U.S. is a world leader in clean air.”
Communities of color are disproportionately affected by issues such as climate change, air pollution, and toxic waste. The issues of climate change and racism are intertwined, and the climate justice movement does great work in seeking to address and remedy these issues. Isaac and Johnson's Washington Examiner op-ed did not address that work, the awful tactics that are used to manipulate communities of color, or the continued usage of fossil fuels that is killing Black Americans.
TPPF has a history of climate denial, and many of its former employees worked in the Trump administration. It’s no surprise that they write off climate justice or that they found a receptive outlet in the Washington Examiner, which regularly platforms climate deniers and obstructionists.
8. On Newsmax’s website, Larry Bell praises climate downplayers Bjorn Lomborg and Michael Shellenberger, saying they have exposed the “alarmist climate agenda.”
In a piece for Newsmax, Larry Bell embraced climate contrarians Bjorn Lomborg and Michael Shellenberger, who within weeks of each other this summer released books that downplay the seriousness of climate change. Bell’s piece was titled “Prominent Eco-Activists Expose Alarmist Climate Dogma.”
Bell praised Shellenberger and Lomborg’s books, highlighting Shellenberger’s claims that climate change is not making natural disasters worse,and that renewable energy is suspect. He also highlighted that Lomborg’s book claims climate change is “not the apocalyptic threat so widely advertised” and quoted Lomborg as saying that climate change is now “politicized panic.”
Neither Lomborg nor Shellenberger are climate scientists; their views are outside of the consensus of the climate science community. Both books were criticized heavily; Climate Feedback stated that Shellenberger had mixed “accurate and inaccurate claims in support of a misleading and overly simplistic argumentation about climate change.” The Pacific Institute’s Peter Gleick called his book “bad science and bad arguments.” Lomborg has long been exposed as a serial liar when it comes to his climate change claims; his book was given a scathing review by Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz.
Both authors represent an insidious form of climate denial, one that right-wing media are increasingly turning to. By claiming that climate change is real but not that much of a problem, they continue to give cover to fossil fuel and polluting industries wrecking the planet.
9. Rush Limbaugh claims “there is no man-made global warming” and lambasts BBC for rightly calling him part of the climate denial problem.
On his August 3 radio program, host Rush Limbaugh mused over his inclusion in BBC Radio’s How They Made Us Doubt Everything, a podcast about the origins of climate denial. Rush then stated: