A power struggle over the Republican Party’s direction is playing out in Fox News’ prime-time block.
Fox host Tucker Carlson issued a public ultimatum to Greg Abbott during Tuesday night’s broadcast, demanding that the Texas governor come on his show and explain why he has not deployed the state’s National Guard to the border to “save the rest of us” from the migrant “invasion” entering from Mexico. If he failed to do so, Carlson warned that he would host Abbott’s primary opponents instead as soon as Wednesday.
Within the hour, Abbott was talking to Fox’s audience -- not on Carlson’s show, but on the program of fellow prime-time host Sean Hannity. Abbott had the opportunity to respond to Hannity’s softball version of Carlson’s questions about the National Guard, over a laughably propagandistic chyron that read, “Gov Abbott On How He Is Taking Bold And Decisive Action To Address Border Chaos Amid Biden Admin’s Neglect.”
Abbott is a fixture on Hannity’s show, making at least 15 appearances on the program this year alone, more than almost any other would-be 2024 GOP presidential candidate. He’s also repeatedly appeared on the third Fox prime-time show, The Ingraham Angle, most recently on Monday. But Carlson claimed on Wednesday that Abbott has “refused” to come on his show despite repeated requests, and indeed, he has not appeared on the program since December.
The prime-time divide over Abbott’s performance points broader shifts in the GOP and at Fox, as ethnonationalist and traditionalist factions of the conservative movement struggle for power.
Carlson and Hannity are both influential forces within the Republican Party, but they use their programs in very different ways.
Hannity is first and foremost a GOP mouthpiece -- the broadcast he puts on is rarely distinguishable from what you would expect to hear from the Republican National Committee. Hannity has traditional conservative policy preferences, supporting lower taxes, laxer regulation, and a hawkish foreign policy. But he largely runs his show as a showcase for the party’s talent, helping Republican officials promote their talking points and defend themselves from criticism. When Hannity criticizes Republican leaders, it is usually for their insufficient loyalty to former President Donald Trump.
Carlson, by contrast, actively seeks to move the Republican Party in the direction of his show, which at this point resembles a toxic mix of the conspiracy theories of Infowars, the xenophobia of Stormfront, and the authoritarian zeal of Viktor Orbán’s Hungary. What’s more, Carlson has proven remarkably effective in shaping the GOP’s policy preferences and messaging. Rather than shifting with the party line, like Hannity, he regularly lashes out at Republican leaders who stray from his own, denouncing those who offer solidarity to Black people protesting racism and producing brutal interviews with GOP governors who prove insufficiently willing to use the power of their states against trans people.
Abbott went on Hannity’s show on Tuesday knowing that he was unlikely to face tough questions, having previously used that platform to tout his state’s COVID-19 response, denounce President Joe Biden’s immigration policy, and falsely blame clean energy for Texas’ power grid woes. And indeed, Hannity introduced the interview by describing Abbott as “standing strong” and “doing everything in his power to protect Texans.” His question about the National Guard effectively served Abbott up with why it would be a bad idea to pursue the strategy Carlson had pushed for. And his final question looked like this: