New York Times Public Editor Clark Hoyt takes time out this weekend to look at the way journalists use certain words for some sensitive topics.

“If the Obama administration takes out a radical Muslim cleric hiding in Yemen, would it be a 'targeted killing' or an 'assassination?'” he asks. “Was the flooding of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina a 'natural disaster' or a 'man-made' one? Should new construction authorized by Israel in East Jerusalem be called Jewish' housing' or 'settlements?'"

As we know, more and more these days the use of such words can spark anger, finger-pointing and claims of bias. In many cases, however, reporters and editors are just trying to explain something on deadline.

“If some readers feel The Times sometimes softens the truth, others believe journalists use shorthand that sometimes distorts it,” Hoyt adds.

Another reminder to be careful, but don't let it alter the reporting to the point that it is inaccurate or unclear.