LIMBAUGH: The Sunday New York Times published a recent interview with Supreme Court Justice Ruth “Buzzi” Ginsburg, and after expressing her annoyance over a 1980 decision that forbids using Medicaid tax dollars for abortions, Justice Ginsburg said this -- I want to quote it: “Frankly, I had thought at the time that Roe was decided that there was concern about population growth, particularly growth in populations we don't want to have too many of, so that Roe was going to then be set up for Medicaid funding for abortion,” unquote.

Now growth in populations we don't want to have too many -- that's Planned Parenthood. That was the original goal of Planned Parenthood. The original goal of Planned Parenthood was to abort various minorities out of existence. That was the original purpose. I think in Ruth “Buzzi” Ginsburg's case, when she says that she thinks Roe was about population growth, particularly growth in populations you don't want to have too many of, she's probably thinking about aborting conservatives. But the problem with that is it's the liberals that are aborting each other, or themselves -- their future generations.

Now what's astounding about this is that a matriarch of modern liberalism was candid about the underlying objective of the abortion movement -- that is to rid society of entire populations deemed unworthy. Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was an early proponent of this. You know, it's called eugenics. And her aim was to wipe out the African-American population.

Other infamous world figures acted upon similar instincts using other means to object -- achieve their objectives: concentration camps, mass gassings, so-called ethnic cleansings. Planned Parenthood's no different -- Margaret Sanger's Planned Parenthood no different than any of the people that used concentration camps, mass gassing, so-called ethnic cleansings.

And what's just ironic as it can be is that the primary supporters of Planned Parenthood are liberals. And it's -- but here comes Ruth “Buzzi” Ginsburg just out of the box admitting what this is all about.

Now it is all about, you know, a woman's right to choose, I mean that's the umbrella under which it all happens, but I've -- the thing about this group, Planned Parenthood and, you know, you put up an adoption center next to an abortion clinic. And what will happen is the Planned Parenthood people come out and try to keep every pregnant woman possible from going into the adoption center. There's money involved in all of that.

Now Justice Ginsburg has not yet stated which American population she would like to see wiped out using Medicaid taxpayer-funded abortions. New York Times interviewer didn't ask. Perhaps assumed that New York Times readers already know what population Ruth “Buzzi” Gins -- I'm mentioning this now because we've got another one of these type people being investigated today. Confirmation hearings. Sonia Sotomayor is probably right down the path with Justice Ruth “Buzzi” Ginsburg on this issue.

See, somebody like me who can read the stitches on the fastball, read between the lines. Justice Ginsburg's remarks tell the real story and that they ought to dispel for all time any notion of the abortion movements about privacy or choice or freedom, and it should also tell you why they are so damned -- I must say this -- insistent that Medicaid -- that's poor people medical care -- Medicaid money be used for abortions. Tell you why liberals reacted so strongly to my term “feminazi.” My term “feminazi” hit way too close to home.