While Russia continues its war against Ukraine, far-right influencer Jack Posobiec has boosted narratives promoted by pro-Russian aggregation accounts on both his Telegram and Twitter accounts. As right-wing commentators have eagerly looked for partisan excuses to explain Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Posbiec has turned to pro-Russian “military news” Telegram accounts for talking points about the conflict.
Posobiec explicitly stated that his public statements are influenced by the content on Telegram. The far-right pundit said that “if you aren’t on Telegram you are way behind on all Ukraine-Russia news,” and he complained that “neocon TV guests” are ignorant of the events in Ukraine because ”they don't even know what Telegram is.” Posobiec has further elaborated that there is a “Telegram / Twitter gap” and that “Telegram is at least a week ahead of MSM Twitter on the Ukraine war,” while stating that he incorporates information obtained from these Telegram channels and “anon Twitter” posts alongside more traditional reporting into his podcast shows.
Posobiec previously served as a prominent amplifier of the Macron Leaks (a hack attributed by some to the Russian intelligence agencies) as well as the Russian intelligence-backed fake news site SouthFront, and more recently he helped push the Ukrainian bioweapons labs conspiracy theory. Now, he has contributed to cross-platform spread of narratives originating from pro-Russian Telegram accounts.
Telegram has been a key vector in the Russian social media dis- and misinformation campaigns during the war. While the platform has long enjoyed popular (and aboveboard) use by Ukrainians and Russians, its adoption by the American far-right since the aftermath of January 6 has made the platform a unique staging ground for pro-Russian misinformation to metastasize and jump platforms.
From March 3 to April 1, Posobiec used his Telegram channel to uncritically and without context amplify at least 28 pieces of content (many posted in Russian) from the following Telegram channels, which have been characterized by Social Media Analysis Toolkit and other disinformation researchers as pushing a pro-Russian line:
- 14 posts from the English-language geopolitics news aggregator Intel Slava Z (also known as Intel Slava).
- 5 posts from the Russian-language war footage aggregator Лик Войны.
- 4 posts from the English-language military news aggregator ASB Military News.
- 1 post from the Russian-language pro-Kremlin tabloid Комсомольская правда (also known as Komsomolskaya Pravda).
- 1 post from the Russian-language naval news aggregator Zаписки мичмана Птичкина.
- 1 post from the official account of Russia’s Embassy in Belarus.
- 1 post from the Russian-language, pro-Russian separatist news account Inside 🅉 Donetsk (also known as Inside Donetsk).
- 1 post from the Russian-language military news aggregator Милитарист.
Twitter is Posobiec’s primary social media platform, where he has 1.7 million followers, however the influencer has directed users to his smaller Telegram account of over 182,000 followers as a place for less-censored content.
Though he often shares the same information on Twitter under the pretense of obtaining it from more neutral sources, some of Posobiec’s Telegram post time stamps suggest that he was influenced to post the content after reading it from pro-Russian sources first. Posobiec amplified at least 4 pro-Russian posts on his Telegram channel that correlate with similar tweets he made within a few minutes or hours, seemingly laundering Kremlin talking points from Telegram to his Twitter followers:
- March 4: Posobiec forwarded a post from a pro-Russian Telegram channel which claimed that the Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant then under Russian attack was “reliably protected” from tank shells and that “Ukrainian propaganda” was lying about the possibility of fallout. A little over 10 minutes later, Posobiec tweeted that “they lied about Zaporizhzhya because they want to pull the US into the war.” Later the same day, Posobiec accused a Twitter user of not being “smart enough to follow realtime reporting,” stating that the “nuclear plant wasn’t in danger of meltdown."