ERIC BOEHLERT: I just want to say, one of the things I noticed right after the debate -- within the first 30 minutes when I was just kind of surfing around cable news -- the idea that if Trump wins he's going to put his political opponent in jail. That was kind of brushed over. I wasn't seeing a lot of discussion about it. It seemed like it took like 45 minutes for an hour to that -- for that to set in. And people -- as I was watching the cable coverage about 11:30, midnight, people only then really kind of said, “Wait a minute, what are we talking about here? This sounds like a dictatorship.” So, if Trump goes on stage and says, “When I win, I'm going to put you in jail,” that's kind of the full stop. You can't --
ARI RABIN-HAVT (HOST): Well, but that's part and parcel of the conservative media rhetoric. I mean, Trump -- Hillary For Prison is an Infowars meme.
BOEHLERT: That's right. That's right. And this idea that she should be locked up -- and we've seen that for a long time -- but for Trump to explicitly say on the debate stage, “When I win, I'm going to unleash the federal government on you, and then you're going to be in jail,” that's not how democracies work. But, my point was, if you're a pundit in your analysis, and you acknowledge that he said that and it's weird, you can't then go on to say then it was a draw. That's kind of a full stop. Him wanting to put his political opponent in jail, that means that -- you can't then say he might have won the debate. Those two things are contrary to each other. And I just think it was weird that it seemed to take about an hour for that to set in. I don't know if pundits were watching Twitter and people were realizing that people were pointing out the insanity of all that, but, to me, that was just like -- that was crazy.