Research/Study
Major print outlets fail to adequately cover extreme agenda laid out by Trump in Time interview
The Wall Street Journal barely mentioned Trump’s anti-democratic proposals and his abortion policy in the week following Trump’s interview with Time magazine
Published
On April 30, Time magazine published an in-depth interview with former President Donald Trump at his Mar-a-Lago residence, during which the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee described various far-right policies he intends to enact should he win reelection. Even though Trump discussed his plans for a potential second term in some detail, print media have not adequately covered his agenda in the days since the interview.
Media Matters reviewed articles about Trump from three of the top U.S. newspapers by circulation — The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post — for whether they included mention of Trump's plans to undermine or subvert democracy and democratic institutions, his proposed immigration policies, or his position on reproductive rights. (We excluded articles covering only the court proceedings in Trump’s ongoing New York hush-money trial.)
The New York Times and The Washington Post did focus on potential attacks on democratic institutions but failed to adequately address Trump’s extreme positions on reproductive rights and immigration. Meanwhile, the Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal failed to meaningfully address any of these topics in its coverage of Trump outside of its reporting on his hush-money trial.
Our findings showed:
- The Wall Street Journal made just 1 mention of Trump’s anti-democratic agenda and 1 mention of his abortion policy.
- All three newspapers largely failed to cover Trump’s plan to deport 11 million immigrants, among other extreme immigration policies, mentioning it in only 10% of all the articles Media Matters examined.
- The Wall Street Journal published significantly fewer articles on Trump than The New York Times and The Washington Post (19 for the Journal compared to 29 and 35 for the Times and the Post, respectively). Additionally, a smaller percentage of The Wall Street Journal’s articles discussed Trump’s agenda (21% for the Journal compared to 41% and 43%, respectively, for the Times and the Post).